Comments on: Bare Bones Sucks: Not Really http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:40:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Shawn http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really#comment-747 Shawn Wed, 26 Feb 2003 05:08:56 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really/#comment-747 Of course what does suck is the "newish" bare bones web site. The previous verion was much easier to use and look at. Of course what does suck is the "newish" bare bones web site. The previous verion was much easier to use and look at.

]]> By: Zac http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really#comment-746 Zac Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:13:37 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really/#comment-746 And, apparently, the analogy isn't flawed. Hey, what are the chances of getting four responses from Zacs (even if we both replied to our own comments) in a row? And, apparently, the analogy isn't flawed.

Hey, what are the chances of getting four responses from Zacs (even if we both replied to our own comments) in a row?

]]> By: Zac http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really#comment-745 Zac Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:09:18 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really/#comment-745 The analogy would only be correct if BareBones were somehow burdened with the bandwidth everytime you launched BBEdit Lite. As it appears, the analogy is flawed anyway. What do I know? I use xemacs. The analogy would only be correct if BareBones were somehow burdened with the bandwidth everytime you launched BBEdit Lite.

As it appears, the analogy is flawed anyway.

What do I know? I use xemacs.

]]> By: zachk http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really#comment-744 zachk Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:44:05 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really/#comment-744 hum. guess i should have checked all of my facts first. heh. let me rephrase: "bbedit lite is _still_ free as long as you already have it downloaded." that work? hum. guess i should have checked all of my facts first. heh. let me rephrase: "bbedit lite is _still_ free as long as you already have it downloaded." that work?

]]> By: zachk http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really#comment-743 zachk Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:37:33 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/02/25/bare_bones_sucks_not_really/#comment-743 i think your analogy is a little off. bbedit lite is _still_ free unlike with itools and .mac, where you were forced to pay or stop using those services. but with bbedit lite and wrangler you can still use bbedit lite for free or pay and get wrangler, which has more features than bbedit lite. yes? i think your analogy is a little off. bbedit lite is _still_ free unlike with itools and .mac, where you were forced to pay or stop using those services. but with bbedit lite and wrangler you can still use bbedit lite for free or pay and get wrangler, which has more features than bbedit lite. yes?

]]>