Comments on: MTNoThreadedComments http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski Wed, 23 May 2012 23:05:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Erik J. Barzeski http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments#comment-1029 Erik J. Barzeski Sun, 09 Mar 2003 23:11:15 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments/#comment-1029 I have shell access yes, but it's just not worth the time for something I don't want to begin with :-) By "every new version" I mean modifying templates, making sure nothing was goofy, etc. No actual "work" may be required but I'd still spend a good amount of time, have to wait for the next patch, etc. I have shell access yes, but it's just not worth the time for something I don't want to begin with :-) By "every new version" I mean modifying templates, making sure nothing was goofy, etc. No actual "work" may be required but I'd still spend a good amount of time, have to wait for the next patch, etc.

]]> By: Jacques Distler http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments#comment-1028 Jacques Distler Sun, 09 Mar 2003 16:44:25 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments/#comment-1028 You worried about the modifications to the MovableType source-code? If you have access to the command-line, it's trivial to rerun "patch -p0 < mt-262-threaded-comments.patch" after the upgrade. There's a certain amount of one-time work to modify your templates to use threaded comments (and, if you're using MySQL, to modify your database as well). But that's a one-time thing. For upgrades, it should add no more than 30 seconds (tops) to the process. You worried about the modifications to the MovableType source-code?

If you have access to the command-line, it's trivial to rerun "patch -p0 < mt-262-threaded-comments.patch"

after the upgrade.

There's a certain amount of one-time work to modify your templates to use threaded comments (and, if you're using MySQL, to modify your database as well). But that's a one-time thing. For upgrades, it should add no more than 30 seconds (tops) to the process.

]]> By: eli sarver http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments#comment-1027 eli sarver Sat, 08 Mar 2003 12:29:18 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments/#comment-1027 I agree with Joel on a lot of his points, and I especially hate threaded discussions. I'm attempting to implement his discussion model with postgreSQL and PERL. I agree with Joel on a lot of his points, and I especially hate threaded discussions. I'm attempting to implement his discussion model with postgreSQL and PERL.

]]> By: Eric http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments#comment-1026 Eric Sat, 08 Mar 2003 07:17:14 +0000 http://nslog.com/2003/03/07/mtnothreadedcomments/#comment-1026 As far as I'm concerned, anything that Alexei writes which is at version 0.1 is better than anything most normal people would write at version 3.0. It may not be what you're looking for, but I'm sure it's solid code. As far as I'm concerned, anything that Alexei writes which is at version 0.1 is better than anything most normal people would write at version 3.0. It may not be what you're looking for, but I'm sure it's solid code.

]]>