<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FemiNazis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2003 03:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>EVERY MAN AND WOMAN FOR THEMSELVES. NO MORE SEX = NO MORE PROBLEMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVERY MAN AND WOMAN FOR THEMSELVES. NO MORE SEX = NO MORE PROBLEMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abigail</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Abigail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>I am 16 years old and a feminist to the core.  I personally think that the draft itself is unjust, but that if men have to suffer for it, then so should women.  I have no desire to ever join the military or take up arms for any reason, but I plan to register for the draft when I turn 18 because I believe in equal rights and equal responsibility.  That is not to say that I would not defend my country, only that the life of a soldier is not at all the kind of life I want.  If I&#039;m needed, I&#039;m ready.  If I ever am drafted, I hope it will be for a just war.  I support the troops but disagree with Gulf War II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 16 years old and a feminist to the core.  I personally think that the draft itself is unjust, but that if men have to suffer for it, then so should women.  I have no desire to ever join the military or take up arms for any reason, but I plan to register for the draft when I turn 18 because I believe in equal rights and equal responsibility.  That is not to say that I would not defend my country, only that the life of a soldier is not at all the kind of life I want.  If I'm needed, I'm ready.  If I ever am drafted, I hope it will be for a just war.  I support the troops but disagree with Gulf War II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ford</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1672</link>
		<dc:creator>ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2003 05:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1672</guid>
		<description>uh, jamie, about the anything that bleeds for six days and doesn&#039;t die just isn&#039;t human thing, it&#039;s just a joke, it&#039;s not really something that mystifies guys minds and has us scratching our heads like &quot;I don&#039;t get it, they&#039;ve been bleedin for days and aren&#039;t dead yet&quot; you may have already known that, but the way you went into explaining how it&#039;s not an injury it&#039;s just some yadda yadda yadda that made me think that you honestly thought we were perplexed about the bleeding thing, just wanted to clear that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh, jamie, about the anything that bleeds for six days and doesn't die just isn't human thing, it's just a joke, it's not really something that mystifies guys minds and has us scratching our heads like "I don't get it, they've been bleedin for days and aren't dead yet" you may have already known that, but the way you went into explaining how it's not an injury it's just some yadda yadda yadda that made me think that you honestly thought we were perplexed about the bleeding thing, just wanted to clear that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 03:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>i think that ur all nit piking 2 much, this guy has some really good points, just accept them and dont make dumb pointless comments like some women or my friend crystal thinks....like really!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that ur all nit piking 2 much, this guy has some really good points, just accept them and dont make dumb pointless comments like some women or my friend crystal thinks....like really!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2003 02:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>Okay, just to clarify in advance, the phrase &quot;we do it&quot; was not to imply any particular &#8230; ahem &#8230; &quot;physical activity.&quot; :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, just to clarify in advance, the phrase "we do it" was not to imply any particular &hellip; ahem &hellip; "physical activity." <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2003 01:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>Ah, Pat, what you don&#039;t know about menstruation&#8230; Ignorance is bliss, isn&#039;t it? The basis of your very argument (that women menstruate, which essentially cripples them for a week - to the point where their running-through-the-sand abilities are diminished - and should therefore not be allowed to fight in combat arms/hand-to-hand or, commonly, &quot;man-to-man&quot; combat) is very, very sad. I&#039;ve heard the &quot;women are too emotional&quot; and &quot;women are too fearful&quot; and &quot;women aren&#039;t strong enough&quot; argument a hundred times. I&#039;ve found very little validity in those washed-out generalizations, as it seems you have. But menstruation? Hrmph&#8230;



Okay, okay, I&#039;ve heard my brother say, &quot;anyone who bleeds for seven days and doesn&#039;t die is just not human.&quot; But our bleeding isn&#039;t caused by some injury to our bodies; we aren&#039;t crippled. Women run, ski, do gymnastics, and (speaking from experience) dance competitively on their period&#8230; Generally speaking (since we all know that all women are not equally able to handle all situations) we don&#039;t schedule physically tasking activities around &lt;em&gt;that time of the month&lt;/em&gt;&#8230; Rain or shine, menstruation or not, we do it. Personally, it never prevented me from doing any physical activity &#8212; and it wasn&#039;t stamped across my forehead, either (meaning that it didn&#039;t decrease my performance). To be honest, the only time it affects me (and many women) is during the first hour&#8230; certainly not such an unreasonable time as to keep a woman out of combat.



So, Pat, until you pull a tampon out of your /* Insert 4-5 letter word here */ don&#039;t base an argument on menstruation. And if you ever do, that&#039;s just gross&#8230; I don&#039;t think anyone would want to hear about it anyway. :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Pat, what you don't know about menstruation&hellip; Ignorance is bliss, isn't it? The basis of your very argument (that women menstruate, which essentially cripples them for a week - to the point where their running-through-the-sand abilities are diminished - and should therefore not be allowed to fight in combat arms/hand-to-hand or, commonly, "man-to-man" combat) is very, very sad. I've heard the "women are too emotional" and "women are too fearful" and "women aren't strong enough" argument a hundred times. I've found very little validity in those washed-out generalizations, as it seems you have. But menstruation? Hrmph&hellip;</p>
<p>Okay, okay, I've heard my brother say, "anyone who bleeds for seven days and doesn't die is just not human." But our bleeding isn't caused by some injury to our bodies; we aren't crippled. Women run, ski, do gymnastics, and (speaking from experience) dance competitively on their period&hellip; Generally speaking (since we all know that all women are not equally able to handle all situations) we don't schedule physically tasking activities around <em>that time of the month</em>&hellip; Rain or shine, menstruation or not, we do it. Personally, it never prevented me from doing any physical activity &mdash; and it wasn't stamped across my forehead, either (meaning that it didn't decrease my performance). To be honest, the only time it affects me (and many women) is during the first hour&hellip; certainly not such an unreasonable time as to keep a woman out of combat.</p>
<p>So, Pat, until you pull a tampon out of your /* Insert 4-5 letter word here */ don't base an argument on menstruation. And if you ever do, that's just gross&hellip; I don't think anyone would want to hear about it anyway. <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2003 22:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>Just two comments on this whole issue, coming from an average white guy from Indiana who fosters no sense of bigotry in any direction....



First, the concept of women in the military.  Hell of a great idea in almost every aspect, but not all.  There is one arena where, I am speaking scientifically, women should not be involved.  That arena is combat arms.  Anyone can be smart and disciplined.  Women are suited to military life just as well as men in that case.  In direct combat, however, women truly are not equal to men.  I&#039;m not saying that as a pro-male thing, so don&#039;t start flaming me, but give it some serious thought.  Especially in infantry, where you may have to engage in hand-to-hand conflict.  Testosterone fuels the body in that sort of setting, like it did when men and women really did have different roles back in our caveman days.  Our biology and culture do not evolve at the same pace, and we&#039;re still biologically inclined in more or less the same direction as we were in caveman times.  If you have to beat something to death before it beats you, males are genetically programmed to do that sort of thing--it&#039;s how we got a good portion of our food as a species.  Then, there is hygiene.  Sometimes, you are in the field for weeks on end, with no plumbing.  I know because I&#039;ve seen it.  Every 28 days or so, a woman menstruates.  That&#039;s hygiene hell if you&#039;e stuck somewhere totally inhospitable.  If you have to run through the sand for six weeks and you&#039;re running at reduced effectiveness for one of those weeks, do the math.  Women in prolonged direct combat in hostile environments is a bad idea.  Outside of that, though, women can handle the military as well as men can, and anyone who thinks otherwise is thinking with an outdated value system.



Second, on whether or not Feminazis exist (replying to Kynn&#039;s comment.)  They most certainly do, they&#039;ve tried to hang their shit on me before.  That&#039;s all I have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just two comments on this whole issue, coming from an average white guy from Indiana who fosters no sense of bigotry in any direction....</p>
<p>First, the concept of women in the military.  Hell of a great idea in almost every aspect, but not all.  There is one arena where, I am speaking scientifically, women should not be involved.  That arena is combat arms.  Anyone can be smart and disciplined.  Women are suited to military life just as well as men in that case.  In direct combat, however, women truly are not equal to men.  I'm not saying that as a pro-male thing, so don't start flaming me, but give it some serious thought.  Especially in infantry, where you may have to engage in hand-to-hand conflict.  Testosterone fuels the body in that sort of setting, like it did when men and women really did have different roles back in our caveman days.  Our biology and culture do not evolve at the same pace, and we're still biologically inclined in more or less the same direction as we were in caveman times.  If you have to beat something to death before it beats you, males are genetically programmed to do that sort of thing--it's how we got a good portion of our food as a species.  Then, there is hygiene.  Sometimes, you are in the field for weeks on end, with no plumbing.  I know because I've seen it.  Every 28 days or so, a woman menstruates.  That's hygiene hell if you'e stuck somewhere totally inhospitable.  If you have to run through the sand for six weeks and you're running at reduced effectiveness for one of those weeks, do the math.  Women in prolonged direct combat in hostile environments is a bad idea.  Outside of that, though, women can handle the military as well as men can, and anyone who thinks otherwise is thinking with an outdated value system.</p>
<p>Second, on whether or not Feminazis exist (replying to Kynn's comment.)  They most certainly do, they've tried to hang their shit on me before.  That's all I have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>But I suppose using HTML to make that a link was? :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I suppose using HTML to make that a link was? <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etan</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>Etan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>http://www.google.com/search?q=feminist+draft+women+army



That wasn&#039;t too hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://www.google.com/search?q=feminist+draft+women+army">http://www.google.com/search?q=feminist+draft+women+army</a></p>
<p>That wasn't too hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 21:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/03/31/feminazis/#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>Prove you wrong: fine. My friend Crystal disagrees with you, thus proving you wrong. Don&#039;t say &quot;all.&quot; You can no longer be &quot;fairly certain.&quot; Feel free to be &quot;wrong&quot; though. You want to criticize my language (i.e. &quot;some&quot; women), then you&#039;re not above the same criticism.



Cuddling != Sex. Duh. I might cuddle with my daughter, and come to think of it, my son too. Or my dog. Or friends. Cuddling is not cheating.



If you want to question my assumptions, go ahead. But you&#039;re once again stepping into &quot;wrong&quot; territory: I don&#039;t &quot;assume&quot; things about women, and I&#039;m very much in favor of individuals.



Don&#039;t post more comments on this.You&#039;ve succeeded in dragging what I&#039;d hoped might be a real conversation into the pits of semantics and assumptions. In the end, after all, you know nothing about me, and I don&#039;t care what you do think you know.



P.S. Your Google search is pretty lame. &quot;in the&quot; are common words, as is &quot;draft&quot; (draft of this paper, of that proposal, etc.). You want better results (for yourself)? Use a better search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prove you wrong: fine. My friend Crystal disagrees with you, thus proving you wrong. Don't say "all." You can no longer be "fairly certain." Feel free to be "wrong" though. You want to criticize my language (i.e. "some" women), then you're not above the same criticism.</p>
<p>Cuddling != Sex. Duh. I might cuddle with my daughter, and come to think of it, my son too. Or my dog. Or friends. Cuddling is not cheating.</p>
<p>If you want to question my assumptions, go ahead. But you're once again stepping into "wrong" territory: I don't "assume" things about women, and I'm very much in favor of individuals.</p>
<p>Don't post more comments on this.You've succeeded in dragging what I'd hoped might be a real conversation into the pits of semantics and assumptions. In the end, after all, you know nothing about me, and I don't care what you do think you know.</p>
<p>P.S. Your Google search is pretty lame. "in the" are common words, as is "draft" (draft of this paper, of that proposal, etc.). You want better results (for yourself)? Use a better search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

