<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IM Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam#comment-1968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2004 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam/#comment-1968</guid>
		<description>Screen name harvesters are around. But Instant Messenger spam is the &quot;wave of the future&quot; or so I&#039;ve been told by a few sucessful spammers. IM is too much of a controlled environment to get away with excessive spam. 



-jasper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screen name harvesters are around. But Instant Messenger spam is the "wave of the future" or so I've been told by a few sucessful spammers. IM is too much of a controlled environment to get away with excessive spam. </p>
<p>-jasper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Az</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam/#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>i get a god aweful lot of aim spam, i really, hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i get a god aweful lot of aim spam, i really, hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotJ</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam#comment-1966</link>
		<dc:creator>RotJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam/#comment-1966</guid>
		<description>AIM spam&#039;s been around since at least 1999.  It was originally limited mostly to hapless AOL users, but has been expanding ever since.  Not making yourself searchable in your profile greatly reduces the chances of spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIM spam's been around since at least 1999.  It was originally limited mostly to hapless AOL users, but has been expanding ever since.  Not making yourself searchable in your profile greatly reduces the chances of spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Williams</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam#comment-1969</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2003 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2003/04/12/im_spam/#comment-1969</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AIM Spam&lt;/strong&gt;

Erik was talking about AIM/ICQ spam, and it brought back horrid memories of my ICQ days. I was one of...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AIM Spam</strong></p>
<p>Erik was talking about AIM/ICQ spam, and it brought back horrid memories of my ICQ days. I was one of...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

