<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Entourage 2004 Font Fuzzies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Crevier</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9381</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Crevier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 05:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9381</guid>
		<description>It uses ATSUI. It does not do any of its own anti-aliasing. There&#039;s more info &lt;a href=&quot;http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/05/15/entourage_2004&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. I found that Andale Mono 12 point looks great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It uses ATSUI. It does not do any of its own anti-aliasing. There's more info <a  href="http://mjtsai.com/blog/2004/05/15/entourage_2004">here</a>. I found that Andale Mono 12 point looks great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9380</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 08:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9380</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that just the &#039;cleartype&#039; sub-pixel anitialiasing?  The offset near the middle of the line is -.5 pixels or so, so it&#039;s stradling the line and you get red-half-of-a-pixel pixel blue-half-of-a-pixel.



I think it&#039;s ugly... especially on text or anything that skinny.  It might make an edge of a big shape smoother, but when you&#039;re only dealing with a couple pixels the coloring is very noticeable.



~BS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't that just the 'cleartype' sub-pixel anitialiasing?  The offset near the middle of the line is -.5 pixels or so, so it's stradling the line and you get red-half-of-a-pixel pixel blue-half-of-a-pixel.</p>
<p>I think it's ugly... especially on text or anything that skinny.  It might make an edge of a big shape smoother, but when you're only dealing with a couple pixels the coloring is very noticeable.</p>
<p>~BS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Friedman</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9379</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 07:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9379</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know if this is related, but Internet Explorer 5, and now Entourage 2004 do some funky stuff with rendering of text in HTML format...



to me it looks like a random line or two doesn&#039;t get anti-aliased, until i select it. that was one problem i was happy to get rid of when i switched away from IE, and now it&#039;s back in Entourage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don't know if this is related, but Internet Explorer 5, and now Entourage 2004 do some funky stuff with rendering of text in HTML format...</p>
<p>to me it looks like a random line or two doesn't get anti-aliased, until i select it. that was one problem i was happy to get rid of when i switched away from IE, and now it's back in Entourage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9378</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 03:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9378</guid>
		<description>TextEdit uses the Cocoa text renderer, not ATSUI. More to the point: no, it does not have the same problems at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TextEdit uses the Cocoa text renderer, not ATSUI. More to the point: no, it does not have the same problems at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Schaut</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9377</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Schaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9377</guid>
		<description>Since I&#039;m a Word guy, take this with some grain of salt, but Entourage uses Apple&#039;s ATSUI to do text rendering.  See if same problem occurs in TextEdit using the same font and the same font size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I'm a Word guy, take this with some grain of salt, but Entourage uses Apple's ATSUI to do text rendering.  See if same problem occurs in TextEdit using the same font and the same font size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buggin' My Life Away</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9382</link>
		<dc:creator>Buggin' My Life Away</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 02:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9382</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;re: Mac Office 2004 Launched&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>re: Mac Office 2004 Launched</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ballard</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9376</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ballard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 22:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9376</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they&#039;ve implemented their own subpixel smoothing algorithm that doesn&#039;t work right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they've implemented their own subpixel smoothing algorithm that doesn't work right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Onyschuk</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies#comment-9375</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Onyschuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2004/05/19/entourage_2004_font_fuzzies/#comment-9375</guid>
		<description>At first glance, it looks like some sort of cumulative floating point positioning error - perhaps where the text goes fuzzy, the drawing position is bumped by a round() or something...



Would be interesting to see what happens if the window is extra wide - might the text go clear again after a run of similar length?



Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, it looks like some sort of cumulative floating point positioning error - perhaps where the text goes fuzzy, the drawing position is bumped by a round() or something...</p>
<p>Would be interesting to see what happens if the window is extra wide - might the text go clear again after a run of similar length?</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

