Comments on: C++ vs. Obj-C http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:40:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Eduardo Ahumada http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9410 Eduardo Ahumada Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:38:14 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9410 Objective-C++ has three models of programming ? Objective-C++ has three models of programming ?

]]> By: 5t453k http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9409 5t453k Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:30:59 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9409 Własnie wruciłem z premiery "one Last Dance" i muszę stwierdzić że wilm jest kiepski a Swayze się zestarzał i ma strasznie przepity głos..... Własnie wruciłem z premiery "one Last Dance" i muszę stwierdzić że wilm jest kiepski a Swayze się zestarzał i ma strasznie przepity głos.....

]]> By: andy http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9408 andy Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:46:09 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9408 Well, any reasonable programmer should know at least 4-5 programming languages... Well, any reasonable programmer should know at least 4-5 programming languages...

]]> By: Will http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9407 Will Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:29:26 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9407 I can program for mac os x, linux, windows, bsd.... on C++ and well objective C I can't I can program for mac os x, linux, windows, bsd.... on C++ and well objective C I can't

]]> By: Scott Stevenson http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9406 Scott Stevenson Fri, 21 May 2004 22:50:31 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9406 Ernesto - <a href="http://realbasic.com/">RealBasic</a> will feel most comfortable coming from Visual Basic, but I think you'll get more long term value out of Cocoa, particularly if you plan to build bigger apps in the future. Cocoa will also give you the most functionality "for free." <a href="http://cocoadevcentral.com">Cocoa Dev Central</a> is a good place to start. Ernesto - RealBasic will feel most comfortable coming from Visual Basic, but I think you'll get more long term value out of Cocoa, particularly if you plan to build bigger apps in the future. Cocoa will also give you the most functionality "for free."

Cocoa Dev Central is a good place to start.

]]> By: Ernesto http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9405 Ernesto Fri, 21 May 2004 22:26:40 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9405 I'm switching from Windows to Mac and I'm not a programmer but I use VBasic. What should I learn on Mac to make small software? Obj-C? I'm switching from Windows to Mac and I'm not a programmer but I use VBasic. What should I learn on Mac to make small software? Obj-C?

]]> By: Erik J. Barzeski http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9404 Erik J. Barzeski Fri, 21 May 2004 03:33:04 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9404 PulpFiction is largley Obj-C. SQLite is not, of course, and we have some pieces here and there that aren't as well (libxml, libxslt). Rock Star dips down into C a few times as well. Sometimes it's orders of magnitude faster. We have, though, very little C++. PulpFiction is largley Obj-C. SQLite is not, of course, and we have some pieces here and there that aren't as well (libxml, libxslt). Rock Star dips down into C a few times as well. Sometimes it's orders of magnitude faster. We have, though, very little C++.

]]> By: Josh Anon http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9403 Josh Anon Fri, 21 May 2004 03:24:44 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9403 Hey Scott, I think a big part of templates is that they can take fundamental types (float, int, etc.), but in ObjC, only objects can conform to protocols. Hey Scott,

I think a big part of templates is that they can take fundamental types (float, int, etc.), but in ObjC, only objects can conform to protocols.

]]> By: Manton Reece http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9402 Manton Reece Fri, 21 May 2004 03:20:49 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9402 What I'm curious about is how many major Cocoa applications use Objective-C exclusively. Is PulpFiction all Objective-C (other than parts like the SQLite library)? What about the big Apple apps? The Omni stuff? Personally I'm not a big fan of some of the Foundation containers, so having C++ and the STL available is nice. What I'm curious about is how many major Cocoa applications use Objective-C exclusively. Is PulpFiction all Objective-C (other than parts like the SQLite library)? What about the big Apple apps? The Omni stuff?

Personally I'm not a big fan of some of the Foundation containers, so having C++ and the STL available is nice.

]]> By: Scott Stevenson http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_objc#comment-9401 Scott Stevenson Fri, 21 May 2004 02:33:40 +0000 http://nslog.com/2004/05/20/c_vs_obj-c/#comment-9401 I haven't written anything significant in C++ and have never used templates, but based on what I've seen about the syntax, don't protocols cover the same ground in Objective-C? - (id) somethingFromNothing: (id <Nothing>)object; In this case, you can use any object that conforms to the "Nothing" protocol. Is that relevant here? - Scott I haven't written anything significant in C++ and have never used templates, but based on what I've seen about the syntax, don't protocols cover the same ground in Objective-C?

- (id) somethingFromNothing: (id <Nothing>)object;

In this case, you can use any object that conforms to the "Nothing" protocol. Is that relevant here?

- Scott

]]>