<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Technology Debate in Golf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf#comment-14120</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf/#comment-14120</guid>
		<description>There's a difference between blades (what you got) and cavity backs (the Pings). I just switched &lt;em&gt;back&lt;/em&gt; to blades because, for better players, they offer more control.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a difference between blades (what you got) and cavity backs (the Pings). I just switched <em>back</em> to blades because, for better players, they offer more control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spacedog</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf#comment-14119</link>
		<dc:creator>spacedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf/#comment-14119</guid>
		<description>I received Chi Chi Rodriguez cheap irons for Christmas when I was 11. 25 years later I got Ping 3 o-sized irons, mostly because people were making fun of my old clubs.



The Pings are so much more forgiving than the old-style, it is just ridiculous. On the old clubs, you are screwed unless you hit the ball exactly in the center of the face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received Chi Chi Rodriguez cheap irons for Christmas when I was 11. 25 years later I got Ping 3 o-sized irons, mostly because people were making fun of my old clubs.</p>
<p>The Pings are so much more forgiving than the old-style, it is just ridiculous. On the old clubs, you are screwed unless you hit the ball exactly in the center of the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf#comment-14118</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf/#comment-14118</guid>
		<description>It's interesting to note, I think, that advances in technology allows ice hockey to be played in places like Texas year round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's interesting to note, I think, that advances in technology allows ice hockey to be played in places like Texas year round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Buchheim</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf#comment-14117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Buchheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/02/23/the_technology_debate_in_golf/#comment-14117</guid>
		<description>I'd say that bicycling is the closest to golf in terms of technological advancements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd say that bicycling is the closest to golf in terms of technological advancements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
