<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Balance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bud Landry</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance#comment-17686</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Landry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance/#comment-17686</guid>
		<description>it used to be camcorders would include a white translucent lens cap, that would average the light in the scene to help provide a white balance (best used when filling the viewfinder with something that SHOULD be white, first, its the old greycard concept.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it used to be camcorders would include a white translucent lens cap, that would average the light in the scene to help provide a white balance (best used when filling the viewfinder with something that SHOULD be white, first, its the old greycard concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance#comment-17685</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance/#comment-17685</guid>
		<description>just get a whitecard, no? 

a greycard is great for film. ...i imagine a whitecard for digital could be almost as great. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just get a whitecard, no? </p>
<p>a greycard is great for film. ...i imagine a whitecard for digital could be almost as great. <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Landry</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance#comment-17684</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Landry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance/#comment-17684</guid>
		<description>You have your orange tungsten lights, and your blue daylight(and flash), your green flourescents, and you know what should be white in a scene; doesn't really become too complex unless you are mixing the light sources and you have to make a choice as to how much of either looks best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have your orange tungsten lights, and your blue daylight(and flash), your green flourescents, and you know what should be white in a scene; doesn't really become too complex unless you are mixing the light sources and you have to make a choice as to how much of either looks best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digdog</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance#comment-17683</link>
		<dc:creator>digdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2005/12/05/white_balance/#comment-17683</guid>
		<description>You should try &lt;a href="http://www.expodisc.com/"&gt;Wallace Expo/Disc&lt;/a&gt;, it &lt;a href="http://www.alexking.org/blog/2003/04/06/perfect-white-balance/"&gt;works&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should try <a href="http://www.expodisc.com/">Wallace Expo/Disc</a>, it <a href="http://www.alexking.org/blog/2003/04/06/perfect-white-balance/">works</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
