<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacBook Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MacBook Air &#124; NSLog();</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-45339</link>
		<dc:creator>MacBook Air &#124; NSLog();</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-45339</guid>
		<description>[...] I still haven't quite adjusted to calling them MacBooks. Though I despise the name less now than before, I still wish the "PowerBook" name lived on and I think "Air" is a pretty hippie-sounding name for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I still haven't quite adjusted to calling them MacBooks. Though I despise the name less now than before, I still wish the "PowerBook" name lived on and I think "Air" is a pretty hippie-sounding name for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Pegg</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Pegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18019</guid>
		<description>I was reading this thread and also hate the macbook pro name, especially pro, because if they are trying to make us NOT think of windows, that was a terrible idea. Pro? wtf, why not make "ibooks" the "MacBook Home". anyway that's a whole other story.

At school, i hear people constanly refering to their Dells as "powerbooks". These people act as though the phrase "powerbook" is equivelent to "notebook" or "laptop".  As a result, I understand why apple wants to break away from that trend. However i have a simple 6 step solution for everyone:

1. Look at your powerbook where it says "PowerBook G4" and conjure name alternitives.

2. Sudenly notice that above your keyboard there aren't 2 rows of diffrenet plastic shape quick keys including: volume knobs, volume buttons, bass and treble faders, DSP, Dolby digital, automatic internet explorer openers, 4 power swtiches convienintly located no matter where your hands may be resting. Then observe the sleep buttons including: hibernate, sleep, sleep display, restart, logout, switch user, and shutdown.

3. Turn your powerbook around, and admire the huge glowing white apple logo, that everyone stares at every where you go.

4. Go to a coffee shop, sit down, and wait... Wait for someone with a Dell XPS to walk in with their 2 1/2 inch brick and undo all 6 screen latches and musclefuck the LCD open as the 2 weak plastic hinges creak under the weight of the metallic plastic trim and logo's that the ?designers? created... if you feel like waiting longer you can watch in horor as razor sharp lip on the screen slams down and decaptites user.

5. Apple realizes that if they continue to work on hardware production and minimalist simplistic aesthetic design, from now until the end of time, no one in the world will need to see the name mac in the title to know it's a mac.

6.Admit to yourself that one of the reason's that you purchased a powerbook was becuase the glowing apple logo.  And nothing says that this computer is a mac like that!



In conclusion of this procedure let me say that the word mac in the title is redundant and erronius.  It creates contraditions when discriminating this machine from PC's. Like the use of Pro in different versions of windows.  Macs are beutiful and simple in design. If apple really wanted to, they could remove the apple log, remove the namesake and it still would be unique.  I have seen the best of mac ripoffs, and they don't hold a candle to even the ibook models. Macs are unique and maybe MacBook will grow on me, but i will miss the hook an appeal of the phrase "powerbook".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading this thread and also hate the macbook pro name, especially pro, because if they are trying to make us NOT think of windows, that was a terrible idea. Pro? wtf, why not make "ibooks" the "MacBook Home". anyway that's a whole other story.</p>
<p>At school, i hear people constanly refering to their Dells as "powerbooks". These people act as though the phrase "powerbook" is equivelent to "notebook" or "laptop".  As a result, I understand why apple wants to break away from that trend. However i have a simple 6 step solution for everyone:</p>
<p>1. Look at your powerbook where it says "PowerBook G4" and conjure name alternitives.</p>
<p>2. Sudenly notice that above your keyboard there aren't 2 rows of diffrenet plastic shape quick keys including: volume knobs, volume buttons, bass and treble faders, DSP, Dolby digital, automatic internet explorer openers, 4 power swtiches convienintly located no matter where your hands may be resting. Then observe the sleep buttons including: hibernate, sleep, sleep display, restart, logout, switch user, and shutdown.</p>
<p>3. Turn your powerbook around, and admire the huge glowing white apple logo, that everyone stares at every where you go.</p>
<p>4. Go to a coffee shop, sit down, and wait... Wait for someone with a Dell XPS to walk in with their 2 1/2 inch brick and undo all 6 screen latches and musclefuck the LCD open as the 2 weak plastic hinges creak under the weight of the metallic plastic trim and logo's that the ?designers? created... if you feel like waiting longer you can watch in horor as razor sharp lip on the screen slams down and decaptites user.</p>
<p>5. Apple realizes that if they continue to work on hardware production and minimalist simplistic aesthetic design, from now until the end of time, no one in the world will need to see the name mac in the title to know it's a mac.</p>
<p>6.Admit to yourself that one of the reason's that you purchased a powerbook was becuase the glowing apple logo.  And nothing says that this computer is a mac like that!</p>
<p>In conclusion of this procedure let me say that the word mac in the title is redundant and erronius.  It creates contraditions when discriminating this machine from PC's. Like the use of Pro in different versions of windows.  Macs are beutiful and simple in design. If apple really wanted to, they could remove the apple log, remove the namesake and it still would be unique.  I have seen the best of mac ripoffs, and they don't hold a candle to even the ibook models. Macs are unique and maybe MacBook will grow on me, but i will miss the hook an appeal of the phrase "powerbook".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18018</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18018</guid>
		<description>I doubt it was a negotiating point. Apple wouldn't let something as important as a product name be regulated by a chip supplier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it was a negotiating point. Apple wouldn't let something as important as a product name be regulated by a chip supplier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff LaMarche</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18017</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff LaMarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 02:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18017</guid>
		<description>I'm with you, Erik 100%... BUT...



I wouldn't be surprised if this was a negotiating point between Intel and Apple. Despite the fact that the PowerBook name pre-dates the PowerPC chip, there is an association there and even if it's unintentional, it may be something that Intel wanted Apple to get away from.



PowerBook was a great name. MacBook sucks, but honestly, if I make the assumption that anything with "Power" is out, it's hard to think of a great name to replace "PowerBook". Mac notebooks have ALWAYS been PowerBooks, so speaking as someone who has had a PowerBook since the PowerBook 100 came out, I consider last Tuesday a sad, sad day in the annals of Apple Computer, Inc.



&lt;blockquote&gt;Then you don't have a Mac laptop, you have a MacBook.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Puh-lease. If you have/had a PowerBook, everyone knew that meant a Mac. The new name doesn't do anything but take the obvious and make it stupidly so. It's a dumb name, plus now when I talk about Mac books, I have to clarify that I'm not talking about a computer, but about an actual ink and paper book. Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with you, Erik 100%... BUT...</p>
<p>I wouldn't be surprised if this was a negotiating point between Intel and Apple. Despite the fact that the PowerBook name pre-dates the PowerPC chip, there is an association there and even if it's unintentional, it may be something that Intel wanted Apple to get away from.</p>
<p>PowerBook was a great name. MacBook sucks, but honestly, if I make the assumption that anything with "Power" is out, it's hard to think of a great name to replace "PowerBook". Mac notebooks have ALWAYS been PowerBooks, so speaking as someone who has had a PowerBook since the PowerBook 100 came out, I consider last Tuesday a sad, sad day in the annals of Apple Computer, Inc.</p>
<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-">Jeff LaMarche said</a> on January 16, 2006:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-"><p>Then you don't have a Mac laptop, you have a MacBook.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Puh-lease. If you have/had a PowerBook, everyone knew that meant a Mac. The new name doesn't do anything but take the obvious and make it stupidly so. It's a dumb name, plus now when I talk about Mac books, I have to clarify that I'm not talking about a computer, but about an actual ink and paper book. Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raxbax</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18016</link>
		<dc:creator>raxbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18016</guid>
		<description>PowerMac (G5) = needs to match Power (up to 1000 Watt).
PowerBook = no Mac in the name, so it may by a PC.
Take the power out, put the Mac in and don't think too match!!!

How about "lowPowerBook" or "LowPowerMacBook" or "LowMac" (no thanks)
or MacLowPower or MacBook (ok, some one had this idear before me ;-/  )
taking the low out becose it "negativ"
SpeedBook, (hey thats from me!)
SpeedBookPro, MacSpeedPro, MacSpeedBook, ...
now after years, speed is coming back to the AppleBooks
"ComebackBook"
and so on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PowerMac (G5) = needs to match Power (up to 1000 Watt).<br />
PowerBook = no Mac in the name, so it may by a PC.<br />
Take the power out, put the Mac in and don't think too match!!!</p>
<p>How about "lowPowerBook" or "LowPowerMacBook" or "LowMac" (no thanks)<br />
or MacLowPower or MacBook (ok, some one had this idear before me ;-/  )<br />
taking the low out becose it "negativ"<br />
SpeedBook, (hey thats from me!)<br />
SpeedBookPro, MacSpeedPro, MacSpeedBook, ...<br />
now after years, speed is coming back to the AppleBooks<br />
"ComebackBook"<br />
and so on...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18015</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18015</guid>
		<description>Actually MacBook is a great name. I imagine that both the iBook and Powerbook names will go. MacBook will replace the iBook and MacBook Pro will replace Powerbook. Otherwise, why add the "Pro" to the name? Then you don't have a Mac laptop, you have a MacBook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually MacBook is a great name. I imagine that both the iBook and Powerbook names will go. MacBook will replace the iBook and MacBook Pro will replace Powerbook. Otherwise, why add the "Pro" to the name? Then you don't have a Mac laptop, you have a MacBook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18014</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18014</guid>
		<description>I can kind of cope with MacBook. Kind of. The pro just makes it sound tacky. 

Maybe they felt it need that bit on the end? Shrug. 

I guess what would it've been otherwise, PowerBook Core Duo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can kind of cope with MacBook. Kind of. The pro just makes it sound tacky. </p>
<p>Maybe they felt it need that bit on the end? Shrug. </p>
<p>I guess what would it've been otherwise, PowerBook Core Duo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18013</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18013</guid>
		<description>i think it's simply to finally leave the 15 year old name at a point where renaming makes some sort of sense. 

How better to let people differentiate between powerpc and intel based portables (while the market has both) and also finally have "mac" in the name so that it's never questioned? i've actually heard people calling dell's a powerbook with little regard for what OS was running... but a macbook, there's no question there. :)

i do, however, think the new name kinda sucks. maybe it'll grow on me. (i'm not, however, very upset. doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me, though i could be wrong. we'll see when the next thing is re-named.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it's simply to finally leave the 15 year old name at a point where renaming makes some sort of sense. </p>
<p>How better to let people differentiate between powerpc and intel based portables (while the market has both) and also finally have "mac" in the name so that it's never questioned? i've actually heard people calling dell's a powerbook with little regard for what OS was running... but a macbook, there's no question there. <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>i do, however, think the new name kinda sucks. maybe it'll grow on me. (i'm not, however, very upset. doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me, though i could be wrong. we'll see when the next thing is re-named.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digdog</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18012</link>
		<dc:creator>digdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18012</guid>
		<description>If they have to use this name, then "Mac Book Pro" sounds even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they have to use this name, then "Mac Book Pro" sounds even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro#comment-18011</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/01/10/macbook_pro/#comment-18011</guid>
		<description>I dont know what kinda name that is. A boy on a hockey team we played last name was McKrackin/McCrackin...now thats a stupid but cool last name..lol you could be like "Whats Crackin McCrackin" lol

Courtney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know what kinda name that is. A boy on a hockey team we played last name was McKrackin/McCrackin...now thats a stupid but cool last name..lol you could be like "Whats Crackin McCrackin" lol</p>
<p>Courtney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
