<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GMail Spam Recipes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes#comment-46883</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes/#comment-46883</guid>
		<description>I don't want to get rid of the web clips but I DO want to get rid of those nauseating spam recipes  :mad: . Any idea how to do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't want to get rid of the web clips but I DO want to get rid of those nauseating spam recipes  <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mad.gif' alt=':mad:' class='wp-smiley' /> . Any idea how to do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wood</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes#comment-18390</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 04:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes/#comment-18390</guid>
		<description>P.S.

If you go into Settings -&#62; Web Clips -&#62; Show my web clips above the inbox, you can get rid of that ad bar entirely.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.</p>
<p>If you go into Settings -&gt; Web Clips -&gt; Show my web clips above the inbox, you can get rid of that ad bar entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bracken</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes#comment-18389</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 07:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes/#comment-18389</guid>
		<description>It's good to see Google still has a sense of humour -- or some engineer snuck in an easter egg ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's good to see Google still has a sense of humour -- or some engineer snuck in an easter egg <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wood</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes#comment-18388</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/02/28/gmail_spam_recipes/#comment-18388</guid>
		<description>I used to be pretty anal about keeping that folder clean, a habit carried over from my experience with desktop email. But eventually I learned to let go, at least in the case of Gmail. The spam folder gets purged automatically after 30 days, and items in the spam folder don't count towards my quota, so there's really no reason to delete them. Other than occasionally checking to see if there were false positives (rare), I never look in that folder.

That being said, if you change the number of messages displayed from 50 to 100, then you should be able to roughly double the speed at which you can purge the spam folder. I am sure that Google could easily add this feature, but they're trying to enforce their ideal of not deleting anything by making it as hard as possible to delete. Heck, at first there wasn't even a way to permanently delete messages. And even after they added the delete feature, it wasn't easily accessible. Maybe some day they will realize that most users aren't interested in conforming to their model, and add the features that 'everyone else' has, like purging mailboxes... err... labels. I personally don't mind working within their model, but I think they should leave that choice to the user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be pretty anal about keeping that folder clean, a habit carried over from my experience with desktop email. But eventually I learned to let go, at least in the case of Gmail. The spam folder gets purged automatically after 30 days, and items in the spam folder don't count towards my quota, so there's really no reason to delete them. Other than occasionally checking to see if there were false positives (rare), I never look in that folder.</p>
<p>That being said, if you change the number of messages displayed from 50 to 100, then you should be able to roughly double the speed at which you can purge the spam folder. I am sure that Google could easily add this feature, but they're trying to enforce their ideal of not deleting anything by making it as hard as possible to delete. Heck, at first there wasn't even a way to permanently delete messages. And even after they added the delete feature, it wasn't easily accessible. Maybe some day they will realize that most users aren't interested in conforming to their model, and add the features that 'everyone else' has, like purging mailboxes... err... labels. I personally don't mind working within their model, but I think they should leave that choice to the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
