<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Photoshop Replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cris</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement#comment-18807</link>
		<dc:creator>Cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 10:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement/#comment-18807</guid>
		<description>Have you tried ImageWell?

- Cris
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried ImageWell?</p>
<p>- Cris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement#comment-18806</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 12:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement/#comment-18806</guid>
		<description>If I'm gonna launch PSE I may as well just launch Photoshop, though. Takes almost as long and provides 80% of the functionality. I've never seen PSE as a valid alternative - not enough bang for the buck considering I do need PS's full arsenal of goodies on occasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I'm gonna launch PSE I may as well just launch Photoshop, though. Takes almost as long and provides 80% of the functionality. I've never seen PSE as a valid alternative - not enough bang for the buck considering I do need PS's full arsenal of goodies on occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement#comment-18805</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 04:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement/#comment-18805</guid>
		<description>Photoshop is the only thing that's painful on my MacBook Pro, although it's a little better since I upgraded to 2GB RAM. Non-native applications launch very slowly, but PS is by far the worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photoshop is the only thing that's painful on my MacBook Pro, although it's a little better since I upgraded to 2GB RAM. Non-native applications launch very slowly, but PS is by far the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Albert</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement#comment-18804</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 03:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement/#comment-18804</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Photoshop Elements might do what you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Photoshop Elements might do what you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement#comment-18803</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 01:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/05/19/apples_photoshop_replacement/#comment-18803</guid>
		<description>i know what you mean... though i just leave PS running in the background hidden.

It doesn't really ever suck up too much processing time for anything else i'm doing. (I only quit it when i'm working in Final Cut or other "high profile" apps like that... or the occasional Starcraft session.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know what you mean... though i just leave PS running in the background hidden.</p>
<p>It doesn't really ever suck up too much processing time for anything else i'm doing. (I only quit it when i'm working in Final Cut or other "high profile" apps like that... or the occasional Starcraft session.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
