http://nslog.com/2006/07/09/email_spam_stats The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:16:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://nslog.com/2006/07/09/email_spam_stats#comment-18968 Ludovic Hirlimann Mon, 10 Jul 2006 06:49:47 +0000 http://nslog.com/2006/07/09/email_spam_stats/#comment-18968 What are these stats from ? an MTA ? Anyone using domainkeys on their domain, is it worth implementing ? What are these stats from ? an MTA ?
Anyone using domainkeys on their domain, is it worth implementing ?

]]> http://nslog.com/2006/07/09/email_spam_stats#comment-18967 Erik J. Barzeski Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:04:20 +0000 http://nslog.com/2006/07/09/email_spam_stats/#comment-18967 SpamSieve is miles better than Entourage's built-in functionality, yes. SpamSieve is miles better than Entourage's built-in functionality, yes.

]]> http://nslog.com/2006/07/09/email_spam_stats#comment-18966 Daniel Sun, 09 Jul 2006 17:14:27 +0000 http://nslog.com/2006/07/09/email_spam_stats/#comment-18966 Do you find SpamSieve to be better than the built-in spam functionality? I currently forward all of my mail through earthlink, because that does a much better job of catching spam than OS X Mail does, but still some gets through, and OS X usually misses those too. If SpamSieve does a better job than OS X Mail, perhaps I should use that in conjunction with earthlink's filtering. Do you find SpamSieve to be better than the built-in spam functionality? I currently forward all of my mail through earthlink, because that does a much better job of catching spam than OS X Mail does, but still some gets through, and OS X usually misses those too. If SpamSieve does a better job than OS X Mail, perhaps I should use that in conjunction with earthlink's filtering.

]]>