<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time&#8217;s Person of the Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Budd</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year#comment-36608</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year/#comment-36608</guid>
		<description>I see the Time cover in the feed, but here the img is commented out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the Time cover in the feed, but here the img is commented out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year#comment-32616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year/#comment-32616</guid>
		<description>I sort of assumed that the QuickTime exploit was &lt;a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/2006/12/04/myspace_worm_exploits_quicktime_weakness_to_steal_logins_and_plant_spyware.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.

I'm not sure if I should be surprised that the iSight "issue" (reported at a Mac rumors site) got more press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sort of assumed that the QuickTime exploit was <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/2006/12/04/myspace_worm_exploits_quicktime_weakness_to_steal_logins_and_plant_spyware.html">this</a>.</p>
<p>I'm not sure if I should be surprised that the iSight "issue" (reported at a Mac rumors site) got more press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year#comment-32579</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year/#comment-32579</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="32576"]No, Gruber wasn't wrong, since none of this is sent back to a server. (Except for your screenshot, har har.) Big difference between local loopback and pushing bits down the tubes to the interwebs.[/quote]

I see what you mean. The Java component&#8230; My initial reading was just the capturing of images via embedded QT files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year#comment-32576">Jesper said</a> on December 21, 2006:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year#comment-32576"><p>
No, Gruber wasn't wrong, since none of this is sent back to a server. (Except for your screenshot, har har.) Big difference between local loopback and pushing bits down the tubes to the interwebs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I see what you mean. The Java component&hellip; My initial reading was just the capturing of images via embedded QT files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year#comment-32576</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2006/12/21/times_person_of_the_year/#comment-32576</guid>
		<description>No, Gruber wasn't wrong, since none of this is sent back to a server. (Except for your screenshot, har har.) Big difference between local loopback and pushing bits down the tubes to the interwebs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gruber wasn't wrong, since none of this is sent back to a server. (Except for your screenshot, har har.) Big difference between local loopback and pushing bits down the tubes to the interwebs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
