<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Box Shadows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Buchheim</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows#comment-37834</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Buchheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows/#comment-37834</guid>
		<description>yeah, text-shadow was omitted from CSS 2.1.  Basically they said "hey, no one is ready to use this yet, so let's just put it off until CSS 3"

the "text effects module" of CSS 3 is still in a pretty early draft, and they haven't yet included text-shadow yet, but it's on their list of things to do.  I imagine that it will be included now that there are working implementations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, text-shadow was omitted from CSS 2.1.  Basically they said "hey, no one is ready to use this yet, so let's just put it off until CSS 3"</p>
<p>the "text effects module" of CSS 3 is still in a pretty early draft, and they haven't yet included text-shadow yet, but it's on their list of things to do.  I imagine that it will be included now that there are working implementations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geir-Tore</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows#comment-37647</link>
		<dc:creator>Geir-Tore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows/#comment-37647</guid>
		<description>I thought text-shadow was deprecated in CSS 2.1 (source: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20040730/#text-shadow).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought text-shadow was deprecated in CSS 2.1 (source: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20040730/#text-shadow" >http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20040730/#text-shadow</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickQG</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows#comment-37636</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickQG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/01/08/box_shadows/#comment-37636</guid>
		<description>The lack of text-shadow is still disappointing in Gecko based browsers - I'm wondering if the move to Cairo might make that easier to add in?

However the reality is the only thing I use text-shadow for right now is reducing the visual weight of the fonts I use, and that only needs to be done in Safari right now, so it works out nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of text-shadow is still disappointing in Gecko based browsers - I'm wondering if the move to Cairo might make that easier to add in?</p>
<p>However the reality is the only thing I use text-shadow for right now is reducing the visual weight of the fonts I use, and that only needs to be done in Safari right now, so it works out nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
