<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture vs. Lightroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: E C Gruden</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39697</link>
		<dc:creator>E C Gruden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39697</guid>
		<description>I've been using Lightroom Beta and like it enough that I just purchased the first release. I have not worked in Aperture. I only wish Lightroom had at least burn and dodge tools. Right now, after adjusting a photo in Lightroom, I need to burn and dodge it in Photoshop, then sometimes needing to further adjust in Lightroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been using Lightroom Beta and like it enough that I just purchased the first release. I have not worked in Aperture. I only wish Lightroom had at least burn and dodge tools. Right now, after adjusting a photo in Lightroom, I need to burn and dodge it in Photoshop, then sometimes needing to further adjust in Lightroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39581</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39581</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="39579"]especially after hearing it thrashes on a 3G/5G mac![/quote]

Only when I'm running all my other apps. Until it pages them out (and after quitting, when it pages them all in) it's a bit rough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39579">Arcterex said</a> on February 20, 2007:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39579"><p>
especially after hearing it thrashes on a 3G/5G mac!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Only when I'm running all my other apps. Until it pages them out (and after quitting, when it pages them all in) it's a bit rough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arcterex</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39579</link>
		<dc:creator>Arcterex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/02/20/aperture_vs_lightroom#comment-39579</guid>
		<description>Personally I'm a bit stuck with Lightroom until I get a mac, however from what I've seen from reviews and videos, they seem pretty close to the same for all intents and purposes.  I personally prefer the way that LR handles file management (letting me have my own file structure), but that's just the way I work, I can also see benefits to doing it the other way.  Performance seems decent as well, especially after hearing it thrashes on a 3G/5G mac!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I'm a bit stuck with Lightroom until I get a mac, however from what I've seen from reviews and videos, they seem pretty close to the same for all intents and purposes.  I personally prefer the way that LR handles file management (letting me have my own file structure), but that's just the way I work, I can also see benefits to doing it the other way.  Performance seems decent as well, especially after hearing it thrashes on a 3G/5G mac!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
