Comments on: Aperture vs. Lightroom: Modules Suck http://nslog.com/2007/02/27/aperture_vs_lightroom_modules_suck The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:01:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: blumenvasen.org » Blog Archive » Lightroom vs Aperture: More of the Same http://nslog.com/2007/02/27/aperture_vs_lightroom_modules_suck#comment-39720 blumenvasen.org » Blog Archive » Lightroom vs Aperture: More of the Same Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:32:50 +0000 http://nslog.com/2007/02/27/aperture_vs_lightroom_modules_suck#comment-39720 [...] Aperture is insanely slow on old hardware, and new hardware too, apparently. Erik from nslog writes: Aperture, for me - despite having a dual 3 GHz Mac Pro with 5 GB RAM and 200+ GB free space on the [...] [...] Aperture is insanely slow on old hardware, and new hardware too, apparently. Erik from nslog writes: Aperture, for me - despite having a dual 3 GHz Mac Pro with 5 GB RAM and 200+ GB free space on the [...]

]]> By: PatrickQG http://nslog.com/2007/02/27/aperture_vs_lightroom_modules_suck#comment-39698 PatrickQG Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:23:25 +0000 http://nslog.com/2007/02/27/aperture_vs_lightroom_modules_suck#comment-39698 For me the speed of Lightroom just doesn't outweigh the fact that Aperture just feels right. The whole modes thing really gets on my nerves. Speed wise... working on a MBP, 2.16GHz Core Duo, 2GB ram, 100GB 7200rpm internal drive, ~20GB free. I can use it comfortably even with other apps running, though Photoshop as well means it's best not to have too many other apps open. For me the speed of Lightroom just doesn't outweigh the fact that Aperture just feels right. The whole modes thing really gets on my nerves.

Speed wise... working on a MBP, 2.16GHz Core Duo, 2GB ram, 100GB 7200rpm internal drive, ~20GB free. I can use it comfortably even with other apps running, though Photoshop as well means it's best not to have too many other apps open.

]]>