<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture 2.0 Wishlist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-45567</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-45567</guid>
		<description>It feels like Apple allocated engineering talent away from Aperture, perhaps to support Leopard.

In any event, I'd be delighted with any and all of the wish-list items included above and in Fraser Speirs recent post.

I have a really, really simple request:  I haven't figured out a way to get the Keyword HUD to NOT collapse all the Keywords to their highest rank order when you X it.  Our ranching business (yes, even ranchers use Aperture...) has a significant ongoing scientific effort that uses, among many other approaches, photomonitoring of photo point transects.  Keywords are critical (unit, drainage, allotment, cognizant public landlord, season, etc., etc. -- pushing 100 keywords).  It would be great if the HUD would remember what was open and bring it back up that way, or provide preference settings to do the same thing, or at least allow the user to minimize the HUD (to avoid closing it and collapsing the keyword hierarchy).  Also, the drag and drop to assign keywords is fine, but it would be better to make them "tactile" -- mouse click them in quick sequence -- this would save a lot of time...

Sometimes the simple things are the most important to certain users!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It feels like Apple allocated engineering talent away from Aperture, perhaps to support Leopard.</p>
<p>In any event, I'd be delighted with any and all of the wish-list items included above and in Fraser Speirs recent post.</p>
<p>I have a really, really simple request:  I haven't figured out a way to get the Keyword HUD to NOT collapse all the Keywords to their highest rank order when you X it.  Our ranching business (yes, even ranchers use Aperture...) has a significant ongoing scientific effort that uses, among many other approaches, photomonitoring of photo point transects.  Keywords are critical (unit, drainage, allotment, cognizant public landlord, season, etc., etc. -- pushing 100 keywords).  It would be great if the HUD would remember what was open and bring it back up that way, or provide preference settings to do the same thing, or at least allow the user to minimize the HUD (to avoid closing it and collapsing the keyword hierarchy).  Also, the drag and drop to assign keywords is fine, but it would be better to make them "tactile" -- mouse click them in quick sequence -- this would save a lot of time...</p>
<p>Sometimes the simple things are the most important to certain users!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linh</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-45070</link>
		<dc:creator>Linh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-45070</guid>
		<description>Speed is my main concern.  This is a hobby for me, and I'm not getting a Mac Pro just for Aperture.  Given that, I've been playing more with Lightroom.  I'm uncertain I'll stay in the Apple camp...

With that said, given this post was waaay back in March, I'd simply like to see SOME kind of announcement next month...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed is my main concern.  This is a hobby for me, and I'm not getting a Mac Pro just for Aperture.  Given that, I've been playing more with Lightroom.  I'm uncertain I'll stay in the Apple camp...</p>
<p>With that said, given this post was waaay back in March, I'd simply like to see SOME kind of announcement next month...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Agee</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-45010</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Agee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-45010</guid>
		<description>I'd love to see a new gradient filter tool for aperture. Picassa already has a decent implementation of this tool and I loved it in the Windows days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd love to see a new gradient filter tool for aperture. Picassa already has a decent implementation of this tool and I loved it in the Windows days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Aperture 2.0 Wishlist</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40995</link>
		<dc:creator>soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Aperture 2.0 Wishlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40995</guid>
		<description>[...] has one, and I&#8217;ve been meaning to make one as well, so here it is (with significant overlap with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has one, and I&#8217;ve been meaning to make one as well, so here it is (with significant overlap with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40803</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40803</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="40741"]These nice not-so-little programs are "viewer" programs.[/quote]

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight&#8230;

[quote comment="40741"]I have over 21 years as a full-time professional photographer earning his living from taking pictures.[/quote]

That doesn't make you a good judge of new technology. Clearly.

[quote comment="40741"]A raw file, if it is to be used for anything will be changed to a tiff.[/quote]

Or, you know, not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741">Gary Lloyd said</a> on March 24, 2007:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741"><p>
These nice not-so-little programs are "viewer" programs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight&hellip;</p>
<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741">Gary Lloyd said</a> on March 24, 2007:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741"><p>
I have over 21 years as a full-time professional photographer earning his living from taking pictures.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That doesn't make you a good judge of new technology. Clearly.</p>
<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741">Gary Lloyd said</a> on March 24, 2007:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741"><p>
A raw file, if it is to be used for anything will be changed to a tiff.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Or, you know, not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 04:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40741</guid>
		<description>So, what do we all think? Do we think Aperture or Lightroom are going to replace Photoshop? Get a grip folks. Learn Photoshop and be happy. Never look back. These nice not-so-little programs are "viewer" programs. They are to be used to show images to clients with the intent of selecting the final versions to be printed. You aren't supposed to retouch, or refine, other than, e.g., make a really dark photo lighter and vice-versa. I have over 21 years as a full-time professional photographer earning his living from taking pictures. If I were to charge $10 for a 5x7, please, just shoot me and put me out of my misery.  If you are going to spend $300 for Aperture, what a pity. Just bite the bullet, buy Photoshop if you have the decent credit for a credit card, buy a how-to book, dig in and get it together! And, by the way, dng is sort of a joke. One could think of dng as a pdf. Dng was created to make an image compatible with whatever image editing program. Like, uhh, whatdaya think a tiff is? A raw file, if it is to be used for anything will be changed to a tiff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what do we all think? Do we think Aperture or Lightroom are going to replace Photoshop? Get a grip folks. Learn Photoshop and be happy. Never look back. These nice not-so-little programs are "viewer" programs. They are to be used to show images to clients with the intent of selecting the final versions to be printed. You aren't supposed to retouch, or refine, other than, e.g., make a really dark photo lighter and vice-versa. I have over 21 years as a full-time professional photographer earning his living from taking pictures. If I were to charge $10 for a 5x7, please, just shoot me and put me out of my misery.  If you are going to spend $300 for Aperture, what a pity. Just bite the bullet, buy Photoshop if you have the decent credit for a credit card, buy a how-to book, dig in and get it together! And, by the way, dng is sort of a joke. One could think of dng as a pdf. Dng was created to make an image compatible with whatever image editing program. Like, uhh, whatdaya think a tiff is? A raw file, if it is to be used for anything will be changed to a tiff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan Davidson</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40146</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40146</guid>
		<description>As I've written about over on the Insider Aperture blog, I think mine come down to speed, RAW decode quality, speed, printing improvements, speed, oh and speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I've written about over on the Insider Aperture blog, I think mine come down to speed, RAW decode quality, speed, printing improvements, speed, oh and speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40138</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/03/16/aperture_20_wishlist#comment-40138</guid>
		<description>I would like to see the Lightroom 'click and drag in the respective part of the histogram to recover whites, blacks, saturation and fill light' tool. Wonder if it has a real name.

I would like so see xmp sidecar files and also metadata templates al la Lightroom also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see the Lightroom 'click and drag in the respective part of the histogram to recover whites, blacks, saturation and fill light' tool. Wonder if it has a real name.</p>
<p>I would like so see xmp sidecar files and also metadata templates al la Lightroom also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
