<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrek the Third</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Heinrich Show &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I saw Shrek the Third, and it was bad&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41699</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heinrich Show &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I saw Shrek the Third, and it was bad&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41699</guid>
		<description>[...] wasn&#8217;t expecting much, as I had already read Erik Barzeski&#8217;s review. Sadly, such duds are not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn&#8217;t expecting much, as I had already read Erik Barzeski&#8217;s review. Sadly, such duds are not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Buchheim</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41624</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Buchheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 01:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41624</guid>
		<description>I never understood why anyone considered the first one appropriate for kids.  The humor is all targeted at adults.  It was pretty funny, though.  (Which I found surprising, as I&#039;d found the ads for the original particularly unfunny.)

The second one was just plain bad.  Boring and not funny.

I&#039;m hoping the third is better than the second, but I have no reason to expect it to approach the quality of the first film.  I don&#039;t plan to see it on the big screen..  I&#039;ll wait and watch it on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood why anyone considered the first one appropriate for kids.  The humor is all targeted at adults.  It was pretty funny, though.  (Which I found surprising, as I'd found the ads for the original particularly unfunny.)</p>
<p>The second one was just plain bad.  Boring and not funny.</p>
<p>I'm hoping the third is better than the second, but I have no reason to expect it to approach the quality of the first film.  I don't plan to see it on the big screen..  I'll wait and watch it on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
