<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrek the Third</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Heinrich Show &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I saw Shrek the Third, and it was bad&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41699</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heinrich Show &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I saw Shrek the Third, and it was bad&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41699</guid>
		<description>[...] wasn&#8217;t expecting much, as I had already read Erik Barzeski&#8217;s review. Sadly, such duds are not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn&#8217;t expecting much, as I had already read Erik Barzeski&#8217;s review. Sadly, such duds are not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Buchheim</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41624</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Buchheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 01:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/05/23/shrek_the_third#comment-41624</guid>
		<description>I never understood why anyone considered the first one appropriate for kids.  The humor is all targeted at adults.  It was pretty funny, though.  (Which I found surprising, as I'd found the ads for the original particularly unfunny.)

The second one was just plain bad.  Boring and not funny.

I'm hoping the third is better than the second, but I have no reason to expect it to approach the quality of the first film.  I don't plan to see it on the big screen..  I'll wait and watch it on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood why anyone considered the first one appropriate for kids.  The humor is all targeted at adults.  It was pretty funny, though.  (Which I found surprising, as I'd found the ads for the original particularly unfunny.)</p>
<p>The second one was just plain bad.  Boring and not funny.</p>
<p>I'm hoping the third is better than the second, but I have no reason to expect it to approach the quality of the first film.  I don't plan to see it on the big screen..  I'll wait and watch it on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
