<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: /Library/InputManagers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44133</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44133</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;44131&quot;]Input managers are going away.  Don&#039;t be surprised if they&#039;re not in 10.6 at all.[/quote]

I know - which makes their &quot;promotion&quot; to system-wide use and root ownership all the more confusing in 10.5.

[quote comment=&quot;44131&quot;] but with enough restrictions that it&#039;s hard for a user to accidentally end up with them installed.[/quote]

Ah, but now, users who &lt;em&gt;never actually installed them&lt;/em&gt; are &quot;forced&quot; to use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44131">Tim Buchheim said</a> on November 1, 2007:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44131"><p>
Input managers are going away.  Don't be surprised if they're not in 10.6 at all.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I know - which makes their "promotion" to system-wide use and root ownership all the more confusing in 10.5.</p>
<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44131">Tim Buchheim said</a> on November 1, 2007:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44131"><p>
 but with enough restrictions that it's hard for a user to accidentally end up with them installed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ah, but now, users who <em>never actually installed them</em> are "forced" to use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Buchheim</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44131</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Buchheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44131</guid>
		<description>Input managers are going away.  Don&#039;t be surprised if they&#039;re not in 10.6 at all.  They&#039;re already unsupported for 64-bit processes in 10.5  (and for anything running as root or group wheel).

This &quot;allow them if they&#039;re owned by root and installed systemwide&quot; setup is a compromise.  Some seeds of Leopard disabled input managers completely.  But people complained too much, so they put them back in, but with enough restrictions that it&#039;s hard for a user to accidentally end up with them installed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Input managers are going away.  Don't be surprised if they're not in 10.6 at all.  They're already unsupported for 64-bit processes in 10.5  (and for anything running as root or group wheel).</p>
<p>This "allow them if they're owned by root and installed systemwide" setup is a compromise.  Some seeds of Leopard disabled input managers completely.  But people complained too much, so they put them back in, but with enough restrictions that it's hard for a user to accidentally end up with them installed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Among my wishes for 10.6</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44126</link>
		<dc:creator>soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Among my wishes for 10.6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2007/11/01/library_inputmanagers#comment-44126</guid>
		<description>[...] which will certainly help with the potential threat of malware spreading this way, but, as Erik points out, comes with the non-negligible downside that all installed InputManagers affect every user. They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which will certainly help with the potential threat of malware spreading this way, but, as Erik points out, comes with the non-negligible downside that all installed InputManagers affect every user. They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

