<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture 2.0&#8217;s Hue Selector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46126</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46126</guid>
		<description>If you zoom in with the loupe, you can see that it's actually a 3x3 grid that it is sampling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you zoom in with the loupe, you can see that it's actually a 3x3 grid that it is sampling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46106</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46106</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="46104"]Choosing the hue of an (almost) white area seems like it will pretty much get random results.[/quote]

Yeah. Additionally, we're tricked into seeing that sun as pink rather than virtually white (slightly yellowish).

[quote comment="46104"]The second problem seems like the specific issue that they're looking at the hue of one (or a small #) of pixels.. but once again isn't this expected?[/quote]

I believe it's just one pixel, just like the white balance tool. I would like to see a feature added to Aperture that allows users to choose between a 1x1, 3x3, and 5x5 grid for both the white balance and hue selection tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46104">Matt Sayler said</a> on February 19, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46104"><p>
Choosing the hue of an (almost) white area seems like it will pretty much get random results.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah. Additionally, we're tricked into seeing that sun as pink rather than virtually white (slightly yellowish).</p>
<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46104">Matt Sayler said</a> on February 19, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46104"><p>
The second problem seems like the specific issue that they're looking at the hue of one (or a small #) of pixels.. but once again isn't this expected?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I believe it's just one pixel, just like the white balance tool. I would like to see a feature added to Aperture that allows users to choose between a 1x1, 3x3, and 5x5 grid for both the white balance and hue selection tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Sayler</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46104</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Sayler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/02/19/aperture_20s_hue_selector#comment-46104</guid>
		<description>Choosing the hue of an (almost) white area seems like it will pretty much get random results.   That's hard in general, right?

The second problem seems like the specific issue that they're looking at the hue of one (or a small #) of pixels.. but once again isn't this expected?

Maybe I don't understand the tools..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choosing the hue of an (almost) white area seems like it will pretty much get random results.   That's hard in general, right?</p>
<p>The second problem seems like the specific issue that they're looking at the hue of one (or a small #) of pixels.. but once again isn't this expected?</p>
<p>Maybe I don't understand the tools..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
