<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: *Book: Old vs. New</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MacBook Pro Has Arrived &#124; NSLog();</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new#comment-46368</link>
		<dc:creator>MacBook Pro Has Arrived &#124; NSLog();</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/book_old_vs_new#comment-46368</guid>
		<description>[...] new MacBook Pro arrived today. The FedEx guy first "attempted to deliver" it at 8:21am. By "attempted to deliver" I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new MacBook Pro arrived today. The FedEx guy first "attempted to deliver" it at 8:21am. By "attempted to deliver" I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mayne</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new#comment-46217</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/book_old_vs_new#comment-46217</guid>
		<description>I want to use this as my primary (only) machine, moving from a Mac Pro. I wanted to retain some mobility by getting the 15", but I really want the higher resolution. 

Torn, but since I spend 90% of my time at a desk I ordered the 17". 

I just can't understand why there is not Hi-res option for the 15". Also why there is no 12" option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to use this as my primary (only) machine, moving from a Mac Pro. I wanted to retain some mobility by getting the 15", but I really want the higher resolution. </p>
<p>Torn, but since I spend 90% of my time at a desk I ordered the 17". </p>
<p>I just can't understand why there is not Hi-res option for the 15". Also why there is no 12" option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new#comment-46215</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/book_old_vs_new#comment-46215</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="46214"]What are your thoughts on this?[/quote]

For you or for me?

Because my thoughts "for me" were, this morning, "dammit, I have to buy a 15". Why haven't they come out with something like the 12" I'm replacing?" :-) In other words, resolution of a portable isn't really a concern. I just try to balance power and size.

The 15" MBP is 1 x 14.1 x 9.6 (and 5.4 lbs) and the MB is 1.08 x 12.78 x 8.92 (5.0 lbs). Not enough of a size savings there to justify the weaker performance.

There's still no real 12" successor.

For you&#8230; I don't know. I wouldn't presume to know whether the added size of the 17" (and cost) is worth the resolution bump for you. I will say that most people who travel even a little with their 17" laptops tend to wish they had gotten a 15" instead. The ones who use them on a desktop like the 17".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new#comment-46214">Paul Mayne said</a> on February 26, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new#comment-46214"><p>
What are your thoughts on this?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For you or for me?</p>
<p>Because my thoughts "for me" were, this morning, "dammit, I have to buy a 15". Why haven't they come out with something like the 12" I'm replacing?" <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> In other words, resolution of a portable isn't really a concern. I just try to balance power and size.</p>
<p>The 15" MBP is 1 x 14.1 x 9.6 (and 5.4 lbs) and the MB is 1.08 x 12.78 x 8.92 (5.0 lbs). Not enough of a size savings there to justify the weaker performance.</p>
<p>There's still no real 12" successor.</p>
<p>For you&hellip; I don't know. I wouldn't presume to know whether the added size of the 17" (and cost) is worth the resolution bump for you. I will say that most people who travel even a little with their 17" laptops tend to wish they had gotten a 15" instead. The ones who use them on a desktop like the 17".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mayne</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/powerbook_macbookpro_old_vs_new#comment-46214</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/02/26/book_old_vs_new#comment-46214</guid>
		<description>Man, I was SO hoping they would release a Hi-resolution screen for the 15". I've been waiting for this update to place my order, but now I'm thinking I better go with the 17" simply because I want the higher resolution display. 

What are your thoughts on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I was SO hoping they would release a Hi-resolution screen for the 15". I've been waiting for this update to place my order, but now I'm thinking I better go with the 17" simply because I want the higher resolution display. </p>
<p>What are your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
