<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Canon 5D Mark II (Rumors)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-47347</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-47347</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="47344"]So why would you bother to write all of this - perpetuating the same-ol rumors? We've seen all of this elsewhere.[/quote]

Obviously you were searching for it, so I don't know how much you can really condemn me.

Besides, it's still interesting to see what people speculate will be coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a href="http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-47344">SaintJose said</a> on April 21, 2008:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-47344"><p>
So why would you bother to write all of this - perpetuating the same-ol rumors? We've seen all of this elsewhere.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Obviously you were searching for it, so I don't know how much you can really condemn me.</p>
<p>Besides, it's still interesting to see what people speculate will be coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaintJose</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-47344</link>
		<dc:creator>SaintJose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-47344</guid>
		<description>So why would you bother to write all of this - perpetuating the same-ol rumors? We've seen all of this elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why would you bother to write all of this - perpetuating the same-ol rumors? We've seen all of this elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinrich</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-46614</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/03/12/the_canon_5d_mark_ii_rumors#comment-46614</guid>
		<description>Rumors are generally worthless in the camera trade.

If I had a dollar for every rumor on DP review for Nikon DSLRs, I'd buy me and YOU a Nikon D3 with plenty o' lenses.

Not that I would know... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumors are generally worthless in the camera trade.</p>
<p>If I had a dollar for every rumor on DP review for Nikon DSLRs, I'd buy me and YOU a Nikon D3 with plenty o' lenses.</p>
<p>Not that I would know... <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
