<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photographers as Aggressors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2008/03/20/photographers_as_aggressors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2008/03/20/photographers_as_aggressors</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2008/03/20/photographers_as_aggressors#comment-46795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/2008/03/20/photographers_as_aggressors#comment-46795</guid>
		<description>I recently watched the documentary on James Nachtway called "The War Photographer." A photographer will always be an intrusion to some. Just ask a high-profile celebrity. For others the photographer is a historian.

I think the answer is found in the ethical posture of the photographer. Why are the photos being taken? What is the context?

Nachtway said the following: "The worst thing is to feel that as a photographer I am benefiting from someone else's tragedy. This idea haunts me. It is something I have to reckon with every day because I know that if I ever allow genuine compassion to be overtaken by personal ambition I will have sold my soul."

Photographs are neither good nor evil, they are a medium for communication and artistic expression. However, I believe caution should be used when showing private moments to the public through the use of photography. 

Good questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently watched the documentary on James Nachtway called "The War Photographer." A photographer will always be an intrusion to some. Just ask a high-profile celebrity. For others the photographer is a historian.</p>
<p>I think the answer is found in the ethical posture of the photographer. Why are the photos being taken? What is the context?</p>
<p>Nachtway said the following: "The worst thing is to feel that as a photographer I am benefiting from someone else's tragedy. This idea haunts me. It is something I have to reckon with every day because I know that if I ever allow genuine compassion to be overtaken by personal ambition I will have sold my soul."</p>
<p>Photographs are neither good nor evil, they are a medium for communication and artistic expression. However, I believe caution should be used when showing private moments to the public through the use of photography. </p>
<p>Good questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
