<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rca 2011</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-66140</link>
		<dc:creator>rca 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=5890#comment-66140</guid>
		<description>I think Avatar movie changes a lot the 3D movie industry. I&#039;ve seen these days a movie called &quot;Tangled&quot;. The movie use new 3D technologies and it is amazing. The effects are very well done. Impressive !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Avatar movie changes a lot the 3D movie industry. I've seen these days a movie called "Tangled". The movie use new 3D technologies and it is amazing. The effects are very well done. Impressive !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Linville</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54326</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Linville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=5890#comment-54326</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;54314&quot;][quote comment=&quot;54313&quot;]Was the 3D technique anaglyph or polarization?[/quote]

Must have been polarization. They weren&#039;t red/cyan.

I wasn&#039;t sure at first because I thought the glasses themselves would show polarization, but they don&#039;t seem to show them in the standard fashion. My LCD in my car goes black with my polarized sunglasses at some angles, but I couldn&#039;t get the 3D glasses they gave us to create the same effect.[/quote]

Cool. Ah okay, looks like they used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reald.com/&quot;&gt;RealD&lt;/a&gt; (and RealD&#039;s homepage confirms) which uses circular polarization. Right-hand (clockwise) polarization for the right eye and left-hand (counterclockwise) for the left eye. Linear polarized stuff (LCDs) will make it through no matter what the angle (just at a constant slightly dimmer intensity).

G/f and I are going to check it out this weekend. She spends a lot of time looking at molecules in 3D using eclipsing googles so hopefully she&#039;ll like the polarization technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54314">Erik J. Barzeski said</a> on May 31, 2009:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54314">
<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54313">Aaron Linville said</a> on May 31, 2009:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54313"><p>
Was the 3D technique anaglyph or polarization?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Must have been polarization. They weren't red/cyan.</p>
<p>I wasn't sure at first because I thought the glasses themselves would show polarization, but they don't seem to show them in the standard fashion. My LCD in my car goes black with my polarized sunglasses at some angles, but I couldn't get the 3D glasses they gave us to create the same effect.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cool. Ah okay, looks like they used <a  href="http://www.reald.com/">RealD</a> (and RealD's homepage confirms) which uses circular polarization. Right-hand (clockwise) polarization for the right eye and left-hand (counterclockwise) for the left eye. Linear polarized stuff (LCDs) will make it through no matter what the angle (just at a constant slightly dimmer intensity).</p>
<p>G/f and I are going to check it out this weekend. She spends a lot of time looking at molecules in 3D using eclipsing googles so hopefully she'll like the polarization technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Barzeski</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54314</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Barzeski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=5890#comment-54314</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;54313&quot;]Was the 3D technique anaglyph or polarization?[/quote]

Must have been polarization. They weren&#039;t red/cyan.

I wasn&#039;t sure at first because I thought the glasses themselves would show polarization, but they don&#039;t seem to show them in the standard fashion. My LCD in my car goes black with my polarized sunglasses at some angles, but I couldn&#039;t get the 3D glasses they gave us to create the same effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54313">Aaron Linville said</a> on May 31, 2009:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54313"><p>
Was the 3D technique anaglyph or polarization?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Must have been polarization. They weren't red/cyan.</p>
<p>I wasn't sure at first because I thought the glasses themselves would show polarization, but they don't seem to show them in the standard fashion. My LCD in my car goes black with my polarized sunglasses at some angles, but I couldn't get the 3D glasses they gave us to create the same effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Linville</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54313</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Linville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=5890#comment-54313</guid>
		<description>Was the 3D technique anaglyph or polarization?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the 3D technique anaglyph or polarization?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judi Sohn</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/05/30/up#comment-54312</link>
		<dc:creator>Judi Sohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=5890#comment-54312</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about little kids, but my 10 year old loved it and totally got it. She laughed and cried in all the same places I did. Afterwards, she said one of her favorite parts was when he realized his wife&#039;s greatest adventure was the one he lived with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know about little kids, but my 10 year old loved it and totally got it. She laughed and cried in all the same places I did. Afterwards, she said one of her favorite parts was when he realized his wife's greatest adventure was the one he lived with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

