<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criminal Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nslog.com/2009/07/12/criminal_question/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nslog.com/2009/07/12/criminal_question</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Erik J. Barzeski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Foster</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/07/12/criminal_question#comment-54756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=6071#comment-54756</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;54753&quot;] ...That something has to be wrong in itself (malum in se) for it to truly be a crime.[/quote] I&#039;m with Daniel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quote_header"><a  href="http://nslog.com/2009/07/12/criminal_question#comment-54753">Daniel said</a> on July 14, 2009:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://nslog.com/2009/07/12/criminal_question#comment-54753"><p>
 ...That something has to be wrong in itself (malum in se) for it to truly be a crime.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> I'm with Daniel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Buchheim</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/07/12/criminal_question#comment-54755</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Buchheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=6071#comment-54755</guid>
		<description>One who commits a crime is a criminal.

One who is convicted of a crime is a convict.

at least that&#039;s what Leopard&#039;s built-in dictionary tells me. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One who commits a crime is a criminal.</p>
<p>One who is convicted of a crime is a convict.</p>
<p>at least that's what Leopard's built-in dictionary tells me. <img src='http://nslog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://nslog.com/2009/07/12/criminal_question#comment-54753</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nslog.com/?p=6071#comment-54753</guid>
		<description>I am voting &quot;someone who commits a crime,&quot; but I think the options are not specific enough.  The first option should be split into two:
- someone who commits an act that is &lt;em&gt;malum in se&lt;/em&gt;
- someone who commits an act that is &lt;em&gt;malum prohibitum&lt;/em&gt;

I say that because I don&#039;t think a crime has been committed just because government prohibits something (malum prohibitum).  That something has to be wrong in itself (malum in se) for it to truly be a crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am voting "someone who commits a crime," but I think the options are not specific enough.  The first option should be split into two:<br />
- someone who commits an act that is <em>malum in se</em><br />
- someone who commits an act that is <em>malum prohibitum</em></p>
<p>I say that because I don't think a crime has been committed just because government prohibits something (malum prohibitum).  That something has to be wrong in itself (malum in se) for it to truly be a crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
