I have to BUY QuickTime 7 Pro AGAIN?
Posted April 29th, 2005 @ 11:31am by Erik J. Barzeski
I bought QuickTime Pro 3. Then 4, then 5, then 6, if I remember correctly (one of them may have been a free upgrade). Now I have to buy QuickTime Pro 7, too, and there's no upgrade pricing available? What if I buy Tiger (which I will obviously be doing)?
WTF?
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 11:45am #
Dude, if you buy Tiger, you're still going to have to buy Quicktime Pro 7.
Sorry man.
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 12:01pm #
Yeah, the money-hungry friggers!
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 12:20pm #
Yeah, that has always bothered me too. I bought QT6 (first one I ever used) and don't know if I'll buy QT7. I'll probably just deal with the nagging, because I really don't need the "pro" features.
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 1:15pm #
I wish there was a hack to get rid of the nagging without buying a QT7 Pro key. I'm not going to be using the Pro features; they're charging me for normal, nag-free usage.
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 1:56pm #
Who needs QT7Pro? I'm not saying no one needs the features but those features are a part of QuickTime 7, not QuickTime 7 Pro. Everything is there in the OS, the 'Pro' upgrade just lets you access those features within the QT7 viewer. So... if so many people are unhappy about this in QT5, 6 and now 7 why hasn't someone released their own application that opens up access to these features?
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 2:59pm #
From what I've seen, there's no nag screen anymore - you just see all of the unavailable options greyed out in the menus with the "PRO" tag next to them.
No nag screen - Hurrah!
Having to pay again for features - Boo!
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 5:09pm #
IIRC, QT3-4 (or was it 4 to 5?) was a free upgrade. Quicktime 6 brought MPEG4 which meant Apple has to pay licensing fees for every encoder, and QT 7 brings H.264 which AFAIK also means licensing fees to be paid to MPEG-LA.
So I find it quite understandable that QT Pro 7 is a paid upgrade...
Posted 29 Apr 2005 at 10:33pm #
I bought whatever the first non-free one was (3?) and then got a free license for it with some OS upgrade (8.5?) .. I haven't bought it again since. So Apple, can I trade in my completely unused second license for QT3 for a QT7 license? 😉
You'd think they could afford to include a QT license with every copy of Mac OS X. Or perhaps with hardware .. they bundle a lot of crap with their machines already, why not bundle their own damn software?
Posted 30 Apr 2005 at 12:51am #
you didn't have to pay for every single version. I've only paid a couple times since three