Posted June 19th, 2011 @ 08:08pm by Erik J. Barzeski
I see no reason why QuickTime Player or Preview should restore their state. They're not really "editing" applications, and I rarely close windows in them before I quit the app, particularly if I have only one window open.
Posted June 18th, 2011 @ 08:27pm by Erik J. Barzeski
"As with so many things in my makeup, the answer derives from Charlie Nicklaus. My father taught me the single hardest thing a professional athlete has to learn, which is how to lose gracefully. Dad convinced me very early in my involvement with sports that I had to accept the bad with the good; that, however much it hurts inside, you smile and keep a stiff upper lip; that you shake the hand of the man who's beaten you, and tell him congratulations, and mean it."
Posted June 14th, 2011 @ 12:25pm by Erik J. Barzeski
We'll be acquiring a SAM PuttLab Pro very soon. I'm very excited to look into this. It's not an inexpensive item, but it will be put to good use in our downtown facility, I can bet you that!
Posted June 12th, 2011 @ 12:18pm by Erik J. Barzeski
Hinging actions do not control ball flight, curve, trajectory, etc.
A ball struck with matched impact parameters will fly exactly the same whether you've employed horizontal hinging or vertical hinging or angled hinging.
Hinging actions can determine what's come before, and that is how they express a change in the ball flight - not what they do while impact occurs.
Posted June 11th, 2011 @ 12:15pm by Erik J. Barzeski
The Three Imperatives and Essentials operate to correct faulty procedures. So, if they seem elusive, it is invariably because you are trying to execute them while you hit the ball - in your accustomed manner. That must be reversed. Learn to do those things even if you miss the ball - until you no longer miss it. There is no successful alternative (3-B).
Posted June 8th, 2011 @ 12:07pm by Erik J. Barzeski
Hitting a ball is the easiest part of the game - hitting it effectively is the most difficult. Why trust instinct when there is science? The instructor can only inform and explain - the student must absorb and apply.
Posted June 5th, 2011 @ 10:46am by Erik J. Barzeski
I posted this on Facebook in regards to "method instruction" being bad or close-minded or fixed or whatnot, and I disagree entirely. And I wanted to share it here as well, as it's important and relevant.
Every good instructor has a method. A method is "a procedure, technique, or way of doing something, especially in accordance with a definite plan." Who would admit to not having a plan for a student?
In golf "method teacher" seems to be used as a bad thing, as in "he applies the *same* method to every student." But there's a whole large swath of space between the method being very general like "good contact, hit the ball reasonably far, know where the ball is going" and "the shaft needs to twist about its axis 17.5 degrees while the left arm moves 35 degrees across the chest" (to be clear, I don't think anybody's teaching the latter). Where's the line in the middle that separates those two? Or are both of those "methods"?
Everyone is a method teacher to some degree or another, because nobody who says "no method" really means that - they're simply trying to sell themselves as "I teach the golfer" or "I just teach good impact." Their method is the "'No Method' Method!" To truly have no method is to truly have no plan for a student, and again, nobody teaches that way.
"Method" is misused. Every good instructor teaches the student they have in front of them. Every good instructor teaches "impact." Every good instructor has a "method" because to claim otherwise is to claim that you don't have a plan.
And finally, IMHO, the only way a "method" limits growth is if the "method" becomes so precisely defined that acceptable ranges shrink and cease to become wide ranges of acceptable values or components. Personally, I like generous ranges with constant prioritization so the student can improve.
To put it another way: if you ask any "no method" teacher enough questions, you'll be able to suss out their "method."